Blog – Page 2 – Jim Sollows Photography

7Artisans 35mm F2 Review

In mid October a lens arrived from 7Artisans. They had asked me to review their newest 35mm f2 lens for Leica M mount. I’m a Leica photographer, so I didn’t want to do your typical “unboxing” review. I wanted to really see how it stacks up against a Leica Summilux 35mm and Voightlander Skopar 35mm. 7Artisans simply asked for my opinion and have given me absolute freedom to say anything I want about this lens .. good or bad. My Leica M6 with the 7Artisans 35mm f2 has not left my side side for the past couple weeks. I’ve subjected it to both in-studio and field testing during that period. I’ve done side by side testing to evaluate sharpness and overall image quality in comparison to the other lenses. Now please understand that these are not scientific tests. If you are looking for a lot of graphs, charts and terms like “angle of incidence” and “lens conjugate ratios”, you might as well read no further because to be honest, I don’t care about that stuff. I only care about how the lens renders my images. These are purely subjective comparisons to evaluate the lens from my own perspective and for my usage as a photographer.

Build Quality

From the moment I saw the box, I realized this is not your typical 3rd party lens. The cardboard box is a work of art itself. It’s beautifully designed with a cool magnetic closure. Inside the box, the lens comes in a beautiful brown leather case. I’m not sure if it’s real leather but it certainly looks classy. You rarely see this attention to detail in most other brands. The lens itself feels solid, being entirely metal and glass. The focus is super smooth and the aperture ring is something I’ve never encountered before. I have lenses that are “unclicked” .. you move smoothly from one end of the scale to the other without interruption. I also have “clicked” lenses where the aperture snaps from one f-stop to the next. This lens is somewhere in the middle. It’s smooth and silky like an unclicked lens, but there are still subtle detents you can feel at each aperture setting. If I want to go from f8 to f5.6 without taking my eye from the viewfinder, I can do that because there is a subtle click at each f-stop. However if I want my aperture to be somewhere between f5.6 and f8 I can do that too. I’ve actually sat here just playing with that aperture ring, it’s so amazing. I’ve never seen or felt anything like it, and I hope to see more lens designs do this in the future, it’s a brilliant design.

Focus Calibration

Leica M mount 7Artisans lenses come shipped with a paper focus scale and a little screw driver that can be used to “calibrate” your focus. For starters let me say … if you are mounting this lens on a digital body that offers through-the-lens focusing .. disregard. Just mount your lens and you’re good to go. This really applies to those of us mounting the lens on a rangefinder body, that does not focus through the lens. If you find there is a discrepancy between your camera rangefinder and the numbers on the lens body, you can calibrate the focus scale part of the lens to match your rangefinder. I put this new lens on my M6, walked outside and focused on a tree branch half a km away. I checked the lens body and it was showing I was at infinity. If it was showing anything else I might need to tweak the focus but mine was perfect. Purely out of curiosity I decided to also check the close focus and used the method that 7Artisans suggests on the instructions in the box. The lens was perfectly accurate here as well, so I had no need for any adjustment. I suspect most people will not need to adjust their focus, but you can if you need to.

Sharpness Testing

I mounted my digital camera on a tripod and compared the 7Artisans 35mm against a Leica Summilux 35mm, Fuji XF35mm and Voightlander Skopar 35mm. A focus pattern was mounted on a brick wall. The brick mortar allowed me to look for curvature distortion and also enabled me to look at focus in the corners by looking at the grain of the brick. In a second round of testing I also stuck a small card of fine print on the wall in the top left corner of the frame, so I could use the fine print to help evaluate corner sharpness. Images were shot at every aperture so I could compare each lens at every aperture setting.

They ranked as follows:

#1 Fujifilm XF35 f2

#2 Leica Summilux 35

#3 7Artisans 35 f2

#4 Voightlander 35

The results with the Fujifilm lens was not a surprise. Fuji lenses are amazing quality. Most of the worlds major motion picture’s are shot on Fuji lenses for this reason. In this case the Fuji lens was primarily used as a baseline standard to assist in evaluating the other lenses. Having finished the testing, even as I write this, I still have trouble with the ranking of the 7Artisans and Summilux because they were so incredibly close in the testing I conducted. I think the Summilux was ever so slightly sharper in the extreme corners, but it was a very small difference only noticable at significant magnification In Lightroom. The Voightlander lens was visibly less sharp over all by comparison to the others, but still a fine lens at normal magnification.

Real Use Testing

I shot 3 rolls consisting of Ilford FP4 and HP5. The rolls consisted of frames where the same scene was shot with each of the lenses and the exact same settings on each. They were then compared side by side and ranked in order of preference. The three lenses compared here were the 7Artisans 35mm, Leica Summilux 35mm and Voightlander Skopar 35mm. The Fujifilm XF35 was not included as this was a film test, not digital. The camera body used for this test was my own Leica M6, a camera I’ve shot for years and can trust the results.

The 7Artisans and Leica Summilux were pretty much identical for sharpness in normal view. There were some very subtle differences in contrast. It’s going to be difficult to truly compare the images below in the low resolution needed for online presentation, but it will give you a rough idea of what I saw in the darkroom.

Magnified, the Leica Summilux appeared ever so slightly sharper in the corners on some photos but it was very close, and again this was only visible under magnification. The 7Artisans seemed to have slightly more contrast which I quite like.

There was an issue with the 7Artisans in that it tends to flare quite a bit when shooting into direct, or near direct sunlight. This flare actually rendered some images unusable. The Leica Summilux on the other hand had barely noticeable flare under the same conditions. My first reaction was that this is a problem. However, then I looked at the flared image of the Kayak shop below, an image I had previously dismissed as trash. Something I didn’t expect happened … I actually found I like the flare in this photo! It’s smooth, and gives a very unique etherial quality to the image. In the second shot below you can see the flare caused by reflection of the sun off the deck of the kayak. It’s actually a beautiful effect. In other words, yes the lens flares, but I tend to consider this an artistic characteristic of the lens.

Summary

My final conclusions will be regarding the 7Artisans and Leica lenses specifically, as the Voightlander was visibly outperformed by both these lenses. In most situations I actually had difficulty determining if a shot was taken on the Leica Summilux or the 7Artisans, they are that close. Fortunately I kept detailed notes on each frame shot because in so many cases, that was the only way to identify one from the other. Let me be honest. The Leica Summilux is a gorgeous world-class-lens, but it should be, as the current price of them on the used market is roughly $5000 Cdn. The 7Artisans is only $400 Cdn new, so less than 10% of the price. I find it amazing that the performance of both lenses was so close given such a price difference. The thing that really sets them apart is the flare issue. The 7Artisans 35mm can produce a very artistic flare effect that would be extremely difficult to achieve otherwise. In fact two of my favourite images from the shoot, are the above ones with flare. I will be inclined to use this lens with a hood to minimize flare but I fully intend to throw caution to the wind on occasion and point my lens in the direction of the sun to see what results. In some cases that flare can be magic! As I’ve already said, it’s amazing to see how well the 7Artisans 35mm performed compared to the Summilux. In fact I simply would not have believed it if I had not done these tests for myself. The 7Artisans 35mm f2 is a wonderful lens, and one I will add to my own kit for use over the long term. You can find more information at the 7Artisans web site when the lens is released on November 7th.

The final image below is my favourite from the past two weeks of testing. It was shot with the 7Artisans 35mm F2 WEN lens on my Leica M6 with Ilford HP5 film.

FlicFilm BW&G Developer

FLIC FILM BLACK WHITE & GREEN DEVELOPER REVIEW

I’m a long time Ilford guy! I’ve used Ilford black and white chemistry as far back as I can remember. I decided to try Black/White Green for a couple reasons. For starters, it’s a Canadian product and I’m all for supporting new film photography businesses, especially domestic ones … as long as they make products that measure up to the competition. The second reason is that this new developer is called Black/White & GREEN because it’s environmentally friendly. In fact the main ingredient used is Vitamin C. Another component is an emulsifier found in hand cream. When you are finished processing your film, you could feel safe tossing it down the drain or even into your garden! It’s also safe for those with septic systems. That’s pretty unique, but how does it measure up to my everyday chemicals, namely Ilford Ilfosol 3 or my good old Swiss Army Knife of developers … Rodinal?

Image Quality:

I processed a roll of Ilford HP5 and found the results are comparable to Ilfosol 3. It had very similar grain and contrast levels. I don’t use Rodinal as often, as it tends to be a little grainier. I do use it when working with very old films or large format where grain is less significant so Ilfosol 3 is my main developer and BW&G is very comparable in image quality.

There are other factors to consider:

Shelf Life:

This has never been a big issue for me because I tend to use my chemicals long before they expire. FlicFilm didn’t provide any specifics but in conversation with Dave Marshall, president of FlicFilm, he said “It should have a very long shelf life, much like Rodinal”. He didn’t elaborate beyond that but the shelf life of Rodinal is measured in decades. In fact a few years ago I tried remnants of a bottle of 60 year old Rodinal and it worked as good as fresh. I don’t know if BW&G will last that long but it sounds similar in that it can be stored on a shelf and last a long time. This is the kind of thing that most home film processing folks want to hear. Most of us just won’t get out money worth out of a developer whose life is measured in weeks as opposed to months or years.

Cost:

At $22 for a 250ml a bottle, it’s not the cheapest developer. By comparison, Ilfosol 3 is $16 a bottle for a 500ml bottle. However we can’t stop there because BW&G is used at a tiny 1:49 dilution where I use Ilfosol 3 at 1:14. Based on processing single rolls of 35mm, the BW&G will process 40+ rolls, which works out to 55 cents per roll. The larger bottle of Ilfosol 3 will only process 23 rolls which results in a per roll cost of 70 cents. That’s not a big difference but it add’s up over time. There are other dilution ratios that can be used with Ilfosol 3 but for the purpose of this post I’m using 1:14 as it’ one of the most common, and also what I personally use.

Ease of Use:

Ilfosol 3 comes in liquid form and is very easily mixed with water to make your working strength developer. I was surprised the first time I tried to mix BW&G. I was expecting a similar liquid developer concentrate, but instead I discovered that it has a thick consistency similar to syrup or honey. Pouring the concentrate developer into a graduate cylinder small enough to measure out 6ml proved to be a challenge. Perhaps I should more accurately state that getting the concentrate out of the graduate and into the beaker of water was a bigger challenge. I was eventually able to get the thick developer fully out of the graduate by rocking working strength back into the graduate and then back
into the working strength beaker. By pouring the working strength developer back and forth from the beaker to graduate and then graduate to beaker, several times, I was eventually able to get all the syrup out. Once the concentrate was in the beaker it tended to sit in a lump on the bottom of the water filled beaker. Fortunately in my darkroom I have a magnetic stirrer that quickly resolved that situation and thoroughly mixed the concentrate. If you don’t have such a device, you will be stirring by hand to get the concentrate properly mixed. My recommendation would be to pour your water and concentrate into a bottle with a lid, rather than an open top beaker. That way you could put on the lid and like mixing a martini, a few quick shakes would properly mix your chemical.

Summary:

Will I be switching to BW&G. No, but not because there is anything wrong with it. It’s a nice developer and it works very well! I love that it lasts like Rodinal and is very inexpensive yet gives the finer grain of Ilfosol 3. However, I’ve been using Ilfosol 3 for a long time and it’s readily available at my local camera shop a few minutes from home, so it will remain my main developer of choice.

Would I recommend BW&G for someone starting out? Absolutely! It’s very inexpensive, it’s wonderfully environmentally friendly and it doesn’t need to be stored in air tight containers. You just put the cap back on the bottle and stick it on your shelf. You don’t have to worry about it expiring, it will last a long time. The syrup aspect is a minor annoyance but if you pour the concentrate into a capped bottle with water, and then shake, this becomes less of an issue.

It’s a great developer and one I will absolutely be recommending to my students!

Here is a link to a video of this review

UPDATE

I’ve found a way around the measuring issue mentioned above. Use a digital scale that is able to measure in millilitres. You place the large 500ml beaker on the scale and zero the scale. Add your concentrate, 6ml for one roll in my example, then top up the beaker with water to the desired volume .. all using the scale, it works perfectly and totally addresses the syrup problem I mentioned in the article.

Peek into the Past – Part 2

t was back in April 2022 when I came into possession of an old roll of film in an antique shop. I wrote a blog post about that film and all that went into developing it and the 3 amazing prints that resulted. A lot has happened since then and a follow up post needed to be written to complete the story. If you haven’t read the first instalment, you should do that HERE before going on.

The film had been developed and we have some very old photos that appeared to be around the 1930’s or 1940’s but there was little to go on. I posted them here on my web site and also on my Facebook page. It generated a lot of interest but nothing compared to what was about to happen. It was around this time that my good friend and fellow photographer Steve Bueckert came into the picture. We were chatting one day and Steve suggested, “We really need to try and find these people or at least get more information. What we need is bigger circulation”. Steve went on to tell me about a friend who was a Vancouver newspaper editor. We contacted Bob Kronbauer at Vancouver is Awesome, a publication that circulates news about happenings around the city. Bob instantly took an interest in the story and arranged for an interview with reporter Brendan Kergin. Brendan listened to the story, asked a lot of questions and gathered the pictures. Next thing that happened was that the story not only appeared in the newspaper but it appeared front page. The article invited readers to contact me by social media or my web site if they knew who these people were or could shed more light.

The day the newspaper hit the streets, messages began to arrive. Some of the comments were nothing more than guesswork and a few that were less than helpful. There were also comments from people that identified aspects of the photos that we had not considered. We were even contacted by people who had some real knowledge of the time and offered valuable insights. Each day as new tips came in, Steve and I would discuss the information. We gradually started to assemble more information about the scene. Occasionally new information would add clarity that required us to toss previous assumptions. Here are a few of the things we learned along the way.

The old truck shown in a couple of the photos was common in British Columbia around the 1920’s-1930’s and was usually used in agriculture or logging and was especially common in farming on the south coast.

The bicycle tire shown in one shot is vulcanized rubber that was common in that same period

There is an old wringer washing machine that dates to the early 1920’s

In the background of a couple shots is an MJB coffee can with a logo that was in use in the 1920’s

One of the young women in a photo is wearing a shirt that appears to bear and Flash Gordon graphic. Flash Gordon wasn’t released until the mid 1930’s

Based on the hundreds of tips that came in, we were pretty sure these photos had originated in the mid to late 1920’s, but we still didn’t know anything about the people or where.

One day I received a message that changed everything. A lady in Edmonton, named Pamela, said she was looking at the story in a local paper and instantly recognized the little toddler in a couple photos as being a childhood photo of her Grandmother. The little Toddler was her grandmother Lorraine who was born in 1924 and Pamela said her picture was unmistakable and a perfect match to others she had. To further confirm we had the right person, Pamela was able to identify all the other individuals in the photos including that of her Great Great Grandfather John Ivor Carlson and his wife Great Great Grandmother Jerti Carlson. She had been working on a family tree at the time the newspaper story came out and happened to have other photos of these very same people. They were all a match.

We exchanged messages back and forth with Pamela for a few days, adding details as Pamela worked through her archive of old family photos and notations on the back of many. By now the article had appeared in 22 newspapers across Canada, USA and even UK. I resisted the urge to just tell everyone the mystery had been solved. We still had a piece of the puzzle that just didn’t fit. How could Hjerdis be wearing a Flash Gordon shirt for a movie that won’t be released for another ten years?

One day a message came in from a sports historian who specializes in Olympic memorabilia. He said “I know exactly where that shirt came from. It was released as part of the 1924 Winter Olympics in Chamonix France. It’s not Flash Gordon, it’s actually a graphic of a freestyle skater. With this, the last piece of the puzzle fell into place.

Steve and I were extremely excited, we couldn’t believe we had actually managed to identify these people. The last step was to deliver a set of original prints to Pamela in Edmonton. I thought I could just print them and ship to her in the mail. Steve said “Hey, I have a friend who is also a photographer in Edmonton who I’m sure will help us out!” Steve contacted Owen Law who eagerly offered to assist. We arranged to print the photos and mail them to Owen. Owen would then hand deliver the prints to Pamela, and shoot some photos of her receiving them.

While planning for the print delivery to Owen, I was contacted by Jay Durant, reporter and news anchor from Global News. Global is a major nationwide Canadian TV news service. Jay asked how the search was going and when I explained the findings, he said “We really need to do a story on this!” Within a mater of days I had Jay Durant, TV Cameras and lights occupying my home and even crammed into my darkroom. Jay interviewed me and asked me to explain the process of recovering the film. Sadly Steve was working and unable to be part of the Global interview. I regret that he wasn’t there because his role in this project was just as significant as my own. However Jay was able to arrange for a Global News camera crew from their Edmonton office to accompany Owen when he delivered the photos to Pamela. At one point I said to Jay, “I can’t believe Global is putting so much effort into this little story!”. Jay quickly responded and said “Actually this will be the story people will remember the next day. There is so much bad news that people need to hear this”. When the show aired the following week, it was positioned right at the end of the newscast, to end on a positive note.

This brings to a close, the story of the Verichrome Film. We started with an unknown roll of old film in an antique shop and not only recovered wonderful old photos, but put them back into the hands of the descendants where they belong. Moral of the story, never never never toss away an old roll of film. You never know what piece of history will be lost forever if you do!

I want to offer my personal thanks to the team that made this project possible. This includes Shari Sollows, my wife who was with me the day we found the film and whose tenacious enthusiasm for solving puzzles kept us motivated. Steve Bueckert who was the brains behind the news & social media aspects, and without whom this story would never have been seen by Pamela. Owen Law in Edmonton played a such a very important part when he eagerly volunteered his time and efforts facilitating the final hand over of prints to Pamela in person and being a liaison with the Edmonton Global TV crew. The last photos in the set are Owen and Pamela and the final one is Steve and Jim. Owen passed his camera to the Global cameraman and asked him to take the shot. It’s a wonderful photo to end this story.

Here are a few photos capturing the day the prints were delivered to Pamela in Edmonton.

Peek into the Past – Part 1

My wife and I enjoy visiting antique shops and one Saturday recently we found ourselves in a small shop in Vancouver. It was a tiny store with a limited selection of neatly placed items lining the shelves and tables. Among them, a small selection of camera and darkroom items immediately attracted my attention. I ended up purchasing a few small items. This led to very pleasant chat with the proprietor. When he learned that I do darkroom work and rescue old film, he gave me a couple exposed but undeveloped rolls that had found their way into the shop. One of the rolls was Kodak Verichrome in 130 format, which I had heard of but never actually seen.

Returning home later that day, I did some research and discovered that Kodak Verichrome film was the predecessor to Veriehrome Pan. Information about Verichrome in 130 format is spotty at best. I was able to find a bit of information indicating that it was released in 1907. Verichrome 130 was used to contact print post cards, was discontinued in the early l930’s. In other words this film may well be almost 100 years old.

The question remained, can I actually recover images from film that old? I’ve recovered photos from old lost films before, but nothing close to this age. To further complicate maters, my usual sources of information for developers and times, showed nothing on this very old film. There were many references to Verichrome Pan but not on the older Verichrome and the films do have some significant differences. In other words … I was on my own. I made some decisions based on past experience with vintage film but my choice of developer and times was, a best guess. To further complicate maters was the fact that this unusually large roll film wouldn’t fit any of my more modern development tanks. This meant that the only way to develop the film was to unroll it, in total darkness, and then see-saw it back and forth through each of the chemicals for the required time.

The time had come and there I was in the darkness, unrolling the delicate 1.5 meter long film. Going by feel, I managed to guide it to the developer tray and began the process of see-sawing the film back and forth in the developer. I quickly discovered a consequence of film being rolled tightly into a spool for 100 years … it wants to twist and coil like a snake around my arms. I wrestled with the film trying to, by some miracle, ensure it actually gets into the chemicals. I thought to myself, “There is no way this will work!” Finally when it had been moved through Developer, then Stop Bath and finally Fixer, it was placed into a rinse bath where I was able to turn on the lights.

As my eyes adjusted to the room light, my heart skipped a beat when I saw images! Not just faint, barely perceptible images! These were clear photos. Only the last 3 images were able to be recovered. The two images located on the outermost layers of the roll had degraded over the years and were completely gone. However the remaining three were in good condition. I anxiously hung the film to dry. I couldn’t wait to see the final result!

Following a couple hours of drying, I finally processed the prints. The three prints appear to be a family.

There is an older gentleman, perhaps the grandfather, who is dressed in a way that makes me think he may be a farmer. There are two younger women and man, as well as a young girl roughly 2 years of age.

The background in a couple shots shows the silhouette of an old truck and another shows a very old washing machine. Consulting with someone knowledgeable about historic farm and machinery equipment, these both appear to be 1920/30’s vintage. There is also a very old can of what appears to be MJB coffee with a logo that seems to date back to can design from the same period. We can’t be certain of the dates, this is merely a guess on our part.

The big question remains, who are these people? That we don’t know and likely never will. I have been contacted by a reporter from a local newspaper and magazine that specialize in British Columbia History. They have expressed a desire to continue the research and possibly determine more about the people in these images. What of the photographer that took these photos? Why were these photo’s never developed? Maybe the roll was miss-placed, or given that this may have been early or mid 30’s, perhaps the photographer was called into World War 2 and never came home. We can only guess. Regardless I feel privledged to be able to finish the work that this photographer started so many years ago.

Let me conclude by saying, never assume that an old roll of film is unrecoverable. You never know what mysteries or historic gems might be discovered. Film can remain viable for very long periods of time! I get excited every time I rescue a lost roll of film.

For those curious about the technical details. The film was developed in Rodinal 1:50 for 11 minutes and then 1 minute for Ilford Ilfostop and 8 minutes in Ilford Rapid Fix then a 20 minute rinse. Normal fixing time is 5 minutes but in this case I extrended to 8 minutes to ensure clearing this very old emulsion. The images are actually reversed. They curled so badly and it helped to keep them flat for digitization.

DON’T MISS PART 2 there is a lot more to this story

Alexandra Lodge

I am working on a long term photo project called “Here Today, Gone Tomorrow”. In this project I photograph historic buildings that are rapidly vanishing. The medium I use is large or medium format film which can capture incredible levels of detail. As a subject for this project, I’ve wanted to photograph the Fraser Canyon’s Alexandra Lodge, which is an old, decaying hotel along the once busy highway through the Fraser Canyon.

A lodge has been in operation at this location of the canyon since 1856 where it serviced miners travelling to the gold fields. Wagon and mule trains would pause at this spot, called Chapman’s Bar, on the Fraser River. The lodge provided a rest spot for man and pack animals as they made the arduous trek through the canyon. In later years, it serviced the motoring public as the Trans Canada Highway pushed through the canyon. In its’ heyday, the lodge was operated by the Barrett family, as an elegant establishment. The dining area featured white linen table cloths and an exclusive menu that featured Filet Mignon. Many dignitaries stayed at the lodge, including the King of Siam and his entourage in 1931. The lodge property also has a cemetery that is the resting place for people and families associated with the lodge.

In the late 1980’s the new Coquihalla “super highway” had opened, offering a faster and more direct route for vehicles travelling to Vancouver. Traffic on old Highway 1 slowed to a trickle and so did business at the lodge, and in 1995 it was closed. Since that date, the property has been badly neglected. The buildings have become home to bats and wildlife. The roof deteriorated and began to leak. Wooden timbers rotted and the interior was no longer habitable. Several attempts were made to get the province to formally recognize the lodge as a protected historic site. These attempts failed, sealing the fate of the once magnificent building.

Fortunately this isn’t the end of the story. In October 2021, Shirley and Ken MacKinnon successfully purchased the lodge and surrounding land. Their intention is to restore the old building to it’s former glory and re-open as a B&B, where guests can step back in time. Shirley (below), graciously gave us a tour of the lodge. The passion and optimism she has for the history of this property, was wonderfully evident, as she led us through the building and grounds. She explained her vision for different areas of the building and has a clear understanding of the work involved. In fact, the lodge couldn’t be in better hands, as Ken has spent a career as a renovation contractor and Shirley is an artist. I can’t imagine a better combination of skills to take on such a project.

Our host, Shirley McKinnon who kindly offered to show us around

I’ve included a selection of photos in this blog post. I encourage you, through social media links below, to follow Shirley and Ken on their adventure.

Abby News Story

Alexandra Lodge Facebook Link

Alexandra Lodge Instagram Link

Radioactive Lenses

I was contacted by a student recently who asked “I was just told that all my old lenses are radioactive and dangerous, is that true?” He was quite concerned as he loves shooting vintage lenses but was concerned about the potential health risks. I reassured him and explained that some lenses (not all) made from 1940 thru the 1970’s do utilize radioactive thorium oxide ThO2 to reduce reflections and generally improve optical performance. However the radiation levels should not be concerning, unless you sleep with it and use the lens for hours on end every day. The radiation levels are generally quite low and almost undetectable at distances of a meter or more. Having the camera body between the lens and your face also effectively cuts the levels in half.

The lens in the photo below has a radiation level of 0.105 mR/h which is classified as a “high level”. All tests were done using a GQ GMC Geiger Counter. Measuring through the camera body resulted in a level 0.046 mR/h. Moving the counter 1 m from the lens, there was no detectable radiation above normal background levels. Putting the lens in a cabinet with glass doors, completely blocked all radiation from the lens.

Lets put this in perspective:

Round Trip Cross Country Airline Flight 5.0 mR/h
Hospital X-Ray 5.0 – 10.0 mR/h
Dental X-Ray 10.0 – 40.0 mR/h

Compare those with this lens at 0.105 mR/h and you can see the levels are very low. However radiation injury can be cumulative so sleeping with the lens on your night stand and carrying it on your person 16 hours a day 365 days a year, might be something I personally would reconsider. It’s also important to understand that the majority of lenses are not radioactive. I have tested about 40 lenses this week and only 5 of them are radioactive.

The biggest danger with radioactive lenses is caused when the glass becomes broken or damaged. This may result in tiny particles of glass containing thorium becoming airborne. The radiation does not penetrate clothing or skin well, but if inhaled or ingested, it can be cause for concern. Protect these lenses and if they become damaged you should contact your local authorities for advice on proper disposal. Beyond that, have fun with these beautiful old lenses. Besides, it’s fun to see the reaction when you tell people your lenses are radioactive!

Amateur vs Pro

I frequent a facebook group called “Canadian Amateur Photographers”. It’s been an excellent group where I can enjoy conversations and share images with other hobby photographers similar to myself. I am able to avoid incessant conversations about wedding photography, growing a business, getting clients and other similar chatter common to most other photography groups.

This week something unusual happened. I posted an image and received a very harsh response. “This group is for amateurs and you are clearly a professional, please leave!”. A couple additional people also chimed in venting the same message. Explaining that I have been a photographer for 47 years but my background is health care and I’m strictly a hobbyist / amateur, only yielded the reply “I can tell by looking at your photo’s that you are obviously a professional”.

That brings me to the point of this post. What is a professional vs an amateur. The difference is completely unrelated to the individuals skill or talent. It is entirely related to money. If you receive a significant portion of your income from the activity, you are a professional. If you don’t, you’re an amateur. It’s as simple as that! In the dialogue mentioned previously, they equated professionalism to quality of work, but this is incorrect. The dividing factor is simply dollars!

Does being an amateur mean you are just learning or are bad at what you do? As a case in point, look at the olympics. The original concept of the Olympics has been amateur sport. To compete in the Olympics you had to be an amateur .. meaning you do not receive a wage for participating in your chosen sport. Now having said that it’s obvious that the athletes are neither inexperienced, nor do they perform poorly in their sport. Quite the contrary, they are some of the best in the world .. yet they are amateurs! I do know that the Olympics today has departed from this intent so I’m speaking historically.

Does being a professional mean you are good at what you do. Oh my goodness, no! In fact I recently saw the work of a professional wedding photographer that was unbelievably bad! Most of the images were out of focus. Exposure was all wrong, a bright background put everyones faces in shadow. Composition was terrible with many subjects poorly positioned so that heads were cut off. Yet, this individual was a “professional photographer” .. she charged for her services.

I love the Cambridge English Dictionary definition of the word amateur: “Taking part in an activity for pleasure, not as a job.”

As amateur photographers, we engage in the activity out of passion, not out of obligation to generate an income. Some of the best photographers in the world are amateurs. Going back to the group I mentioned at the beginning, one thing my antagonists seem to miss is the fact that experienced and passionate amateurs are often the first to step forward to volunteer to mentor those who are picking up a camera for the first time. Amateurs can range from newbies who are picking up a camera for the first day, to those with decades of experience. What we all have in common is that we engage in photography because we love doing it!

People Magnets

Today I was out shooting my 1940’s Leica iii when a fellow walking in the opposite direction, suddenly stopped in his tracks. “Oh wow that’s a really old film camera isn’t it?” he asked. We carried on a conversation for about 15 minutes and I learned his name is Lee. He isn’t a photographer but was utterly fascinated with the camera and we had a wonderful conversation. Lee finally asked if he could take a photo of me and my camera using his phone. I said “Sure, but then how about I take a picture of you?”. He responded “Oh that would be cool, a picture of me on a film camera!”

I shoot film for many reasons but a wonderful side effect of shooting old vintage cameras is that they are people magnets. Strangers will come up and initiate conversation with me. I’ve had the most amazing conversations with complete strangers and then I can always turn that into a street portrait. It makes me smile every time this happens.

Lee kept his mask on for the shot but you can still see the wonderful smile in his eyes.

Leica iiiF with Leica Summicron 50mm f2
Fort Langley British Columbia Canada

This is Lee. He stopped on the street to ask me about the Leica iiiF and asked to take a photo of the camera. In turn I got him to pose for a street portrait.

Where does the memory card go?

15 November 2020

I’ve been a photographer for 47 years and live in a small historic town/village called Fort Langley on the west coast of Canada near Vancouver. I shoot Fuji X Series cameras but also a selection of film cameras, some as much as 100 years old. I love shooting film and spending time coaxing the best out of an image in my darkroom.

Several years ago I found myself shooting a scene of some kayakers from a bridge in the village. My camera of choice that day was my Contax 139 film camera. Sharing the same vantage point was a young fellow with his big Nikon DSLR banging away in rapid fire. After several minutes he turned to me and asked; “Is that film?” I answered it was and he responded; “Oh wow, I’ve never seen one before!”

We spent some time talking and he kept asking questions such as; “Where does the memory card go,” and “How do you get the pictures out of the camera?” He was loaded with such questions. Everything I said received the response; “Oh wow!” I asked if he would like to try it and he tentatively took a shot and then instinctively looked at the back of the camera. I laughed and said; “Uh, uh, you don’t see anything until you develop the film!” His response of course was, “Oh wow!” He took a couple more shots as he was utterly fascinated with this concept of film.

His name is Tad, a 22 year old graphic arts student from the local university. Tad grew up in the digital era. Everything was digital and it was all he knew, so this was a unique experience. I offered to email him the shots he took once I developed and digitized them to which he replied, you guessed it; “Oh wow!”

Two days later I emailed the photos to Tad, not really expecting to get a response. He not only responded, but continued to pepper me with questions in utter fascination. His enthusiasm was unquenchable and I became his mentor into the world of film. Today, Tad lives in Toronto, Canada and he exclusively shoots film with his newly acquired Leica M6.

Something happened with that encounter! It helped me to realize that not only is film making a comeback with former film shooters such as myself, but there is a younger ‘digital’ generation, who have never experienced shooting film, don’t understand what it is or how it works, and are intrigued by it. They enjoy the experience of doing something totally different, creating images without computers, using their own vision, and imagination all by using simple manual cameras that, in many instances, are older than they are. Today I meet a constant stream of ‘Tads’. Most are in their 20’s – 30’s while a few older ones are returning to film. This is not a unique phenomenon. Film photography is seeing a significant resurgence, with young adults being the primary driving force. Entirely new films are hitting the market and previously discontinued films are being resurrected.

I refer to myself as a Hybrid Photographer because I shoot both digital and film, with the two worlds becoming intertwined when analogue images are digitized. Hybrid Photography makes film fun and affordable, while removing the need for a darkroom for those not so inclined.

Someone said Film is Dead … I guess I didn’t get that memo!

Social Media to Showcase Your Work?

17 September, 2020

I often hear photographers say, “I don’t need a website I use Instagram .. or Facebook”. That always gives me cause for concern. You are going to trust your work to a company that can ban or shadow ban you in the blink of an eye! They display your images in tiny proportions with massive compression that kills image quality and they only show your images to those they choose as worthy. I know of a photographer who does weddings and maternity photos. She recently had her Instagram account blocked for 48 hours for showing nudity that violates Instagram rules. The “nudity” in question was a new mom bathing her newborn and everything was hidden by bubbles. To trust your online presence to these companies, is foolish at best!

As a photographer, you need a proper web site to represent your work in the best possible light. It gives you complete control over what people see and how your work is displayed. Getting a web site is not as complicated as you might think. There are a variety of services that provide a complete, easy to use website with your own domain and even e-commerce for very low cost. In fact if you are an Adobe Lightroom subscriber, included with your subscription is Adobe Portfolio which is just such a service. In fact this very web site on which you are reading this blog is entirely built on Adobe Portfolio which is already part of your Adobe subscription. They even have client galleries so you can provide a private portal for your clients to view the results of their photo shoot or event, Using their customizable templates you can have a professional looking site in very little time. In fact your Portfolio web site is fully linked with Lightroom. This is not a sponsored advertisement and Adobe has not asked me for endorsement. I just want to let my readers know that this capability exists and many of you who use Lightroom already have it!